That first William Kristol NY Times Op-Ed piece garnered a lot of attention and much of it because of the MM mix up. James Fallows didn’t bother to mention it, but he did take this shot at Kristol’s abilities on his very fine blog:
The other regulars on the Times op-ed page have their tics and strengths and weaknesses. But I have a hard time imagining any of them putting together this lazy a sequence of words.
Fallows might be getting to the heart of modern conservatisms biggest issue.
Perhaps this is more proof of a cunning, leftist NYT master plot? Bringing in a conservative who will demonstrate that conservatives have little interesting to say?