Kristol Clear

That first William Kristol NY Times Op-Ed piece garnered a lot of attention and much of it because of the MM mix up. James Fallows didn’t bother to mention it, but he did take this shot at Kristol’s abilities on his very fine blog:

The other regulars on the Times op-ed page have their tics and strengths and weaknesses. But I have a hard time imagining any of them putting together this lazy a sequence of words.

Fallows might be getting to the heart of modern conservatisms biggest issue.

Perhaps this is more proof of a cunning, leftist NYT master plot? Bringing in a conservative who will demonstrate that conservatives have little interesting to say?

Ouch!

Advertisements

About The Ancient Randonneur

A randonneur and epicure without a sinecure.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s